Save
Save chapter to my Bookmarks
Cite
Cite this chapter
Print this chapter
Share
Share a link to this chapter
Free
Description: The Critical Historians of Art
TWO INTERESTS prompted the writing of this book: firstly, the attraction of a literature which made a serious attempt to say things about the visual arts that would register the energy and complexity of the arts themselves; secondly, the sense that this literature continued to exert an influence largely through shadowy reminiscence, the texts themselves having slipped from view. …
PublisherYale University Press
https://doi.org/10.37862/aaeportal.00131.001
View chapters with similar subject tags
Preface
Two interests prompted the writing of this book: firstly, the attraction of a literature which made a serious attempt to say things about the visual arts that would register the energy and complexity of the arts themselves; secondly, the sense that this literature continued to exert an influence largely through shadowy reminiscence, the texts themselves having slipped from view.
This material was the subject of lectures and seminars given at the University of Essex between 1970 and 1980. I should like to thank all those in the Department of Art who, during that period, argued over its problems. I am particularly indebted to Robert Bernasconi, Valerie Fraser, Michael Holly, Margaret Iversen, Jules Lubbock, Annie Richardson, Anna Tietze and Peter Vergo, and to Maureen Reid for keeping up with, and making adjustments to, continual revisions of the typescript. The comments of John Nash and Alex Potts on the main arguments of the book have been, for me, particularly helpful.
To E. H. Gombrich I owe the debt of anyone working in the field, and more, for many years of conversation. I owe a similar debt to Richard Wollheim, whose Art and its Objects gave focus to many of the issues involved here. Throughout the period of writing, I have discussed the work with Michael Baxandall and Thomas Puttfarken, and they read and criticised drafts with immense generosity of time and thought. Without the library of Warburg Institute, writing the book would, for me, have been inconceivable, and I am very grateful to its librarians for their constant help. Finally, I should like to thank John Nicoll for his encouragement over a long period and Stephanie Hallin for her care in preparing the book for the press.
Preface
Next chapter